At RiskBox, we’ve worked with and supported technology start-ups and scale-ups for over a decade. In that time, we’ve protected them against the evolving risk landscape, guaranteeing they have the right insurance in place to meet their exposures and contractual obligations.
And one of the most important lessons we’ve learned is to source your Cyber and Professional Indemnity (PI) Insurance from the same provider. So let’s unpack why…
Before we start, it’s important to understand the basics:
PI pays to defend your venture from a range of situations that could arise from the services you provide. If you lose a litigation, it also pays the damages and any costs awarded against you.
The core protection revolves around alleged negligence, errors, and omissions, but the best policies also include cover for IP infringement, defamation, breach of confidentiality or privacy, and breach of contract.
A Cyber & Data package provides a combination of covers:
PI has historically provided elements of Cyber coverage when relating to your services – this could include negligently transmitting a virus to your client or failing to maintain a website with patches resulting in your client being affected by a cyber attack.
However, with Cyber being a relatively new insurance product, it’s constantly evolving. Now, we’re seeing insurers tackle that exposure within a designated Cyber product rather than other lines of coverage.
Here are a number of key changes we’ve noticed…
We’re big advocates of keeping both these types of policies with the same insurer where possible. Here’s why…
Claims can cross over two policies – Professional Indemnity and Cyber. Should a cyber attack occur, such as ransomware taking your systems down for a significant period of time, there will be many issues to address, some of which can sit either side of the policy fence.
Whilst the Cyber policy will respond to get you back up and running, if you’re supposed to be delivering work for clients and hitting key financial milestones, PI claims may arise due to breach of contract. Choosing one insurer that can handle the whole situation gives a view of the bigger picture and fills in those important gaps.
Dealing with a cyber claim isn’t easy – especially when you add negotiating with two different insurers on top of the claimant.
By choosing one insurer that can provide both Cyber and PI cover, they can align the response team to support you – and whilst this will still be time consuming, it will avoid a lot of unnecessary duplication and back-and-forth.
Insurers are there to pay claims if the policy is triggered – however, they want to keep their incurred costs as low as possible.
In the event of a claim, it’s important to avoid giving insurers the opportunity to pass responsibility of payment to each other, causing unnecessary and unfair delays when you need the support most.
Having PI and Cyber split over two insurers might mean endorsements are applied that restrict coverage in places, leaving possible gaps over the two policies. Having one insurer who specialises in technology should provide a robust policy to reduce gaps in coverage.
However, when combining these policies under the same insurer, you need to try and ensure there isn’t an aggregation limit over the two policies. This will allow you to benefit from separate limits, even if the claim arises from the same matter.
By combining your PI and Cyber cover under one insurer, you can save yourself time, energy, and even money should a claim arise – but that doesn’t mean the process will be simple. That’s where RiskBox comes in.
We act like the bridge between you and your insurer, handling communications and ensuring that both parties have everything they need. Reach out to our team to learn how else we can streamline coverage for your company.
Photo by Dhaval Parmar on Unsplash